The International Relations Theory

As with all worldwide theories, they ar developed at well-nigh point in time, for specific reasons. Cox come in forward a quote, hypothesis is always for someone and for some purpose (Cox, 1986, 207). The quote at hand, seems list for this essay. There is a wide discipline of views in foreign relations, with peoples opinions differing greatly. For example, the Ameri washbowl world(prenominal) theory scholars would argue that although externalistic theory has been produced greatly in the western world, this would not assume the legitimacy of the theories put forward. thus it can be say that in recent years, worldwideist theory has become more(prenominal)(prenominal) diversified (Barnett 2002). Contrasting to this however, others keep back argued can the theories even be classed as international? With genuinely little recognition to the growth countries (Holden 2001). Is it correct to apply these international theories globally when missing key features like ausp ices and stinting issues which are so authoritative to the worlds gloriole today? A more well rounded come near to the International relations theories would be to push beyond the Western boundaries as the world is enough more globalized for a more unbiased approach, to gain acumen into other cultures for more friendship on the subject. This leave project a deeper understanding of states relations also creating better representations for little states.\nThroughout this essay, i will focus on how international relations favours a Eurocentric world, in addition to this how it does liaison that the majority international theories are Eurocentric through problems appearing. Secondly, the consequences of Eurocentrism including how international theory benefits Westerns states through the likes of security issues moreover imperialism. Finally, to summarize that post-colonialism can be a strong on the international sphere by bringing unneurotic the past legacies of our vast nar ration but also by bringing together contemp...