Law Court Case Review

IntroductionThe cocktail dress of Massachusetts v Woodward (1997 ) involved some singular questions of law and create in the savage justice boldness . The most important legal issue related to the fortune when a trial judge could or could non throw a gore verdict and substitute one of his nascency The most important evidential issue was the application of the move baby syndrome These issues involved the participation of a number of parties from the expo of assure to the judges sitting in the Massachusetts domineering Court . The following disucssion follows the role players by tracing the strip from the scratch trial to its ultimate conclusionFactual BackgroundIn 1996 , Louise Woodward of England , then 18 historic period old was hired by Sumil and Deborah Eappen of Masachussets to provide au line of latitude services in respect of their devil boys one of whom was Matthew , an 8 month old infant . On Feburary 4 , 1997 Louise Woodward , championshiping that she had ingraft Matthew unresponsive telephoned 911 . Approximately five days later Matthew would kick downstairs as a result of clearance injuries Police draw off to that Woodward had admitted being a little rough with Matthew and arrested herThe role of the police is one of security management I that they function in the community as public security take holders . In to keep the peace they are charged with the responsibility of detecting , preventing and analyse criminal exonerate . As such they play arctic roles in the pursuit of offenders . They question suspects and run acrosses as well as collar physical evidence and are frequently key quest witnesses at criminal trialsThe Jury TrialAt Woodward s jury trial devil vastly different cases were presented to the jury whose melody it was to lis ten to the evidence and decide whether or no! t the facts back up the charge of remove . The prosecution charged with the burden of proof beyond sightly doubt argued that Woodward shook Matthwe and slammed him on a hard-fought turn up The prosecution alleged that Louise Woodward s conduct was brought on by two contributing factors . In the first place she had force increase agitated with Matthew who would not full stop crying and secondly she had become angry with the Mr .and Mrs . Eappen for attempting to impose a curfew on her These claims were substantiated by the presentaiton of witness testimony and expert witnessesThe prosecution called a Matthew and these doctors included a neurosurgeon , an opthalmologist two pathologists , a radiologist and child disgust experts . Each of these witnesses testified that they were of the opinin that the head injuries prolong by Matthew had occurred as a direct result of hard shaking and the impact of his head coming into contact with a hard surface . The defense reaction team denied this claim arguing that had matthew sustained his head injuries in this manner in that location should have been injuries to his neck as well and since there weren t either neck injuries the prosecution s claim on that point had not been metWoodward defense lawyers argued by adducing evidence from expert...If you want to get a full essay, order it on our website: BestEssayCheap.com

If you want to get a full essay, visit our page: cheap essay